This research deals with the analysis of public policies towards persons with disabilities in Croatia. Starting from different models of disability and different documents (such as the UN Convention on the Human Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, etc.), the legal and medical mechanisms of creating what is called disability subject are analyzed. This subject of disability is formed not only as a result of a disability model or unilateral effect of public policies, but in research it is approached as a problem (Foucault) that is monitored through the relationship between public policies and the state, and in the areas of activism, self-help and humanitarian actions. Through these areas, the „subject of victimization“ is problematized, which in its own constitution of freedom becomes tied to the conditions of its own existence. The intertwining of the state and the process of subjectivization is the focus of this research. The theoretical work was informed by the research of Michel Foucault and Wendy Brown; from Foucault’s concept of political rationality that simultaneously individualizes and totalizes the bodies of people with disabilities, and Brown’s contribution, which highlights the consequences of emancipatory policy orientation toward the state for articulating political subjectivity. This paper not only tries to apply but reinterpret the stated theoretical frameworks in order to enable reflection on the process of political subjectivization in an area that is rarely analyzed not only in Croatia but beyond. Using the anthropology of public policies, public policy documents towards persons with disabilities were approached not only as holders of a normative function but also as documents that reflect and influence power relations. The paper does indicate how, despite the proclaimed goals, public policies inextricably link persons with disabilities as subjects in their freedom to the state.