The aim of this graduate thesis was to, based to adequate historiographic literature and relevant historical sources, determine whom archbishop Alojzije Stepinac helped, to what extent and in which way, and accordingly to answer a question did he really do enough for the victims of totalitarian regimes. After communist autorithies arrested him and sentenced him to 16 years in prison, in the mounted court process in 1946, a large communist media campaign was conducted against archbishop Alojzije Stepinac. This campaign was backed by attitudes of some historians, according whom Stepinac did not distance himself from Ustashas and he did not do enough for the victims of totalitarian regime. Based on everything that is highlighted in this thesis, author explains that bishop Alojzije Stepinac did not engage in political activity, nor he changed his strong moral beliefs which was confounded from his own belief, despite political turmoils of the communist autorithies. His social work was based on protection of human rights and freedoms. Although he was helping to all people, regardless of race, religion and nationality, he was sentenced because he was constantly protecting Croatian people and he was supporting their desire for independence. Croatian people had plebiscitary right on independence and Stepinac was publicly protesting against massive terror, which the communist authorities were constantly committing against Croatian people and Catholic Church.