The conducted research was inspired by the Ideal Standards Model, which deals with the content and functions of standards in close relationships. According to the model, people hold chronically accessible ideal standards, which refer to three basic partner dimensions (Warmth-Trustworthiness, Vitality-Attractiveness and Status-Resources) and two relationship dimensions (Intimacy-Loyalty and Passion), with which they compare their actual partner and relationship. The degree of consistency/ discrepancy serves to explain, evaluate and regulate the relationship, partner and themselves as a partner. Since the findings about ideal standards and (non)consistencies between ideal and actual features in literature are often interpreted in terms of expectations, rights and deservingness in relationships, this research aimed to examine the sense of relational entitlement, which, as the subjective perception of what one deserves in a relationship, reflects the extent to which an individual expects his or her relational wishes, needs and fantasies to be fulfilled by a partner. Previous research and theorizing suggested distinction between two broader categories of entitlement: adequate, (assertive) and inadequate (excessive and restricted) sense of relational entitlement. Correlational study was conducted on a convenience sample of 228 participants, who completed measures of ideal and actual partner and relationship features and sense of relational entitlement. Apart from the latent structures of these measures, the differences on results regarding gender and current relationship status were analyzed. Analysis of correlations between results on measures of sense of relational entitlement and partner and relationship features suggested that actual/ ideal standards are related to some forms of relational entitlement. Consistency between actual and ideal self features is related to higher Expectations and less Restricted entitlement. Consistencies between actual and ideal features of the partner and relationship are negatively related to Vigilance on negative aspects. Assertive rights are generally positively related to (ideal) Warmth-Trustworthiness, while Sensitivity is in a negative relationship with actual partner and relationship perceptions.