prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Aktualnost Kantova poimanja samoodređenja
Access restricted to students and staff of home institution
master's thesis
Aktualnost Kantova poimanja samoodređenja
2019. urn:nbn:hr:162:465417
Pavičić, Ena
University of Zadar
Department of Philosophy

Cite this document

Pavičić, E. (2019). Aktualnost Kantova poimanja samoodređenja (Master's thesis). Zadar: University of Zadar. Retrieved from https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:162:465417

Pavičić, Ena. "Aktualnost Kantova poimanja samoodređenja." Master's thesis, University of Zadar, 2019. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:162:465417

Pavičić, Ena. "Aktualnost Kantova poimanja samoodređenja." Master's thesis, University of Zadar, 2019. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:162:465417

Pavičić, E. (2019). 'Aktualnost Kantova poimanja samoodređenja', Master's thesis, University of Zadar, accessed 05 April 2025, https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:162:465417

Pavičić E. Aktualnost Kantova poimanja samoodređenja [Master's thesis]. Zadar: University of Zadar; 2019 [cited 2025 April 05] Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:162:465417

E. Pavičić, "Aktualnost Kantova poimanja samoodređenja", Master's thesis, University of Zadar, Zadar, 2019. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:162:465417

Please login to the repository to save this object to your list.
Metadata
TitleAktualnost Kantova poimanja samoodređenja
Title (english)The topicality of Kant’s understanding of self-determination
AuthorEna Pavičić
MentorIris Tićac (mentor)
Committee memberMarko Vučetić (predsjednik povjerenstva)
Committee memberAnte Periša (član povjerenstva)
Committee memberIris Tićac (član povjerenstva)
GranterUniversity of Zadar
(Department of Philosophy)
Zadar
Defense date and country2019-11-05, Croatia
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		HUMANISTIC SCIENCES
Philosophy
Ethics
Abstract
Ovaj rad pokušava pokazati kako bi se Kantovo poimanje samoodređenja moglo uklopiti u moderni diskurs o tome zašto i kako čovjek djeluje. Kant zastupa mišljenje o postojanju slobodne volje, ali mnogi znanstvenici smatraju da je čovjekovo djelovanje determinirano. Glavni pravac koji zastupa tezu da smo određeni genima je genetički determinizam. Takvo tumačenje može dovesti do toga da se djelovanje počne opravdavati na temelju bioloških predispozicija te u tom slučaju nije moguće preuzeti... More odgovornost za djela. Takvo poimanje genetičkog determinizma prizašlo je iz pretpostavke da genetički determinizam i slobodna volja ne mogu biti usklađeni. No, pokazalo se da je genetički determinizam u pravu kada ističe da geni u nekim slučajevima mogu utjecati na čovjeka, ali tada se govori o stvaranju bioloških predispozicija. Što se tiče djelovanja, Kant ne osporava činjenicu da je čovjek dio osjetilnog svijeta te kao takav podliježe prirodnim zakonima u koje spadaju i zakoni evolucije. Ipak, čovjek je i umno biće. Budući da je volja dana u umu, a moralni zakon je faktum uma Kant dolazi do zaključka da se sloboda volje sastoji u tome da se slijedi vlastiti zakon. Zato moralno djelovanje ulazi u područje slobode te ne može biti određeno biološkim predispozicijama. Less
Abstract (english)
This paper tries to show how can Kant’s understanding of self-determination be incorporated into the modern discours about why and how a human being acts. Kant supports the thought about the existence of free will, but a lot of scientists think that human actions are determined. The main strain that pleads that we are determined by our genes is genetic determinism. This interpretation can lead to a state where actions are justified based on biological predispositions because in that... More case we can’t be held responsible for them. This kind of understanding of the genetic determinism emerged from the assumption that genetic determinism and free will can’t be reconciled. It was shown that genetic determinism is right when it stresses that in some cases genes can have an impact on the human being, but only in creating biological predispositions. Kant doesn’t abnegate the fact that the human being is a part of the sensorial world and as such lies under the natural laws like the laws of evolution. Nontheless humans are reasonable beings, too. Will is given in reason and the moral law is a factum of reason Kant concludes that free will consists in pursuing our own law. Because of that do moral actions fall under the field of freedom and can’t be determined by biological predispositions. Less
Keywords
Keywords (english)
Languagecroatian
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:162:465417
Study programmeTitle: Philosophy (double major); specializations in: Teaching
Course: Teaching
Study programme type: university
Study level: graduate
Academic / professional title: magistar/magistra edukacije filozofije (magistar/magistra edukacije filozofije)
Type of resourceText
File originBorn digital
Access conditionsAccess restricted to students and staff of home institution
Terms of useLicence In copyright icon
Created on2019-11-29 10:53:39
accessibility

closeAccessibilityrefresh

If you wish to permanently save changes, click on Save, if not - your settings will be reset when you restart the browser.