prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Bitka kod Zame po Liviju i Polibiju
Access restricted to students and staff of home institution
master's thesis
Bitka kod Zame po Liviju i Polibiju
2019. urn:nbn:hr:162:597839
Pavelić, Dominik
University of Zadar
Department of Classical Philology

Cite this document

Pavelić, D. (2019). Bitka kod Zame po Liviju i Polibiju (Master's thesis). Zadar: University of Zadar. Retrieved from https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:162:597839

Pavelić, Dominik. "Bitka kod Zame po Liviju i Polibiju." Master's thesis, University of Zadar, 2019. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:162:597839

Pavelić, Dominik. "Bitka kod Zame po Liviju i Polibiju." Master's thesis, University of Zadar, 2019. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:162:597839

Pavelić, D. (2019). 'Bitka kod Zame po Liviju i Polibiju', Master's thesis, University of Zadar, accessed 09 November 2024, https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:162:597839

Pavelić D. Bitka kod Zame po Liviju i Polibiju [Master's thesis]. Zadar: University of Zadar; 2019 [cited 2024 November 09] Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:162:597839

D. Pavelić, "Bitka kod Zame po Liviju i Polibiju", Master's thesis, University of Zadar, Zadar, 2019. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:162:597839

Please login to the repository to save this object to your list.
Metadata
TitleBitka kod Zame po Liviju i Polibiju
Title (english)Battle of Zama According to Livius and Polybius
AuthorDominik Pavelić
MentorTeuta Serreqi Jurić (mentor)
Committee memberAnita Bartulović (predsjednik povjerenstva)
Committee memberDiana Sorić (član povjerenstva)
Committee memberTeuta Serreqi Jurić (član povjerenstva)
GranterUniversity of Zadar
(Department of Classical Philology)
Zadar
Defense date and country2019-07-11, Croatia
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		HUMANISTIC SCIENCES
Philology
Abstract
Rad obrađuje dva prikaza bitke kod Zame 202. g. pr. Kr. koje donose Livije i Polibije, dvojica najpoznatijih historiografa rimske povijesti. Predstavljaju se osnovne karakteristike njihove historiografije: Polibije je nešto objektivniji i iznosi čiste podatke, dok Livije teži živomu i vizualnomu pripovijedanju. Usporedno se prati i tumači način na koji ti autori opisuju bitku, događaje koji joj kratko prethode, a posebno razgovor između Hanibala i Scipiona. Analizom se saznaje o ponekim anakronizmima, sličnostima i razlikama u njihovim izvješćima koje pokazuju kako je Livije velikim dijelom koristio Polibijev tekst kao izvor. Ta je bitka značajna po tome što se ona ponekad shvaća kao rimska osveta za poraz kod Kane, a posebno po tome što je Hanibal napokon poraţen
Abstract (english)
The paper deals with two representations of the Battle of Zama 202 BCE which are brought out by Livy and Polybius, two the most famous historiographers of Roman history. We come to know the basic characteristics of their historiography: Polybius is less biased and gives plain information, while Livy strives to the active and visual narrative. We follow and interpret in parallel the way how these authors describe the battle and the events that occurred before, in particular the conversation between Hannibal and Scipio. The analysis shows some anachronisms, similarities and differences in their accounts that imply that Livy has used Polybius' text as a source to a large extent. This battle is significant because it is sometimes understood as a Roman revenge for the defeat at Cannae, and especially because Hannibal has finally been defeated.
Keywords
Keywords (english)
Languagecroatian
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:162:597839
Study programmeTitle: Latin Language and Literature (double major)
Study programme type: university
Study level: graduate
Academic / professional title: magistar/magistra latinskog jezika i književnosti (magistar/magistra latinskog jezika i književnosti)
Type of resourceText
File originBorn digital
Access conditionsAccess restricted to students and staff of home institution
Terms of useLicence In copyright icon
Created on2019-11-29 10:16:41