This paper questions the paradigm shift in the context of philosophy. Based on Kuhn Theory of scientific revolutions, the author tries to explicate Quines influence on philosophy of science led by ''Two dogmas of empiricism''. The beginning of the scientific revolution is equated with the release of Quine's seminal work on dogmas of empiricism. The starting phase is defined by working within 'normal science'. Normal science represents the tradition of logical empiricism that was then the current stream of philosophy. The next step represents the arrival of young scientists whom are supposed to notice anomalies in the current theory. This step could not be represented by Quine's work. Nonetheless, by detecting the anomaly of distinguishing the analytic and synthetic truths, a crisis period occurs. The next step represents a period of unusual science that can be equated with the period of discussion after the release of ''Two dogmas'' and with articulating a new paradigm by theoreticaly reconstructing the tradition of logical empiricism. The final step, the resolution of the revolution and the emergence of a new paradigm, represents Quine's demand for a naturalized epistemology led by moderate holism that offers the solution for two dogmas. To conclude, author questions the problem of incommensurability thesis by comparing naturalized epistemology with logical empiricism.