prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Polarizacija hrvatskog političkog prostora kroz teoriju polja Pierrea Bourdieua
Access restricted to students and staff of home institution
undergraduate thesis
Polarizacija hrvatskog političkog prostora kroz teoriju polja Pierrea Bourdieua
2018. urn:nbn:hr:162:709035
Miloš, Franko
University of Zadar
Department of Sociology

Cite this document

Miloš, F. (2018). Polarizacija hrvatskog političkog prostora kroz teoriju polja Pierrea Bourdieua (Undergraduate thesis). Zadar: University of Zadar. Retrieved from https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:162:709035

Miloš, Franko. "Polarizacija hrvatskog političkog prostora kroz teoriju polja Pierrea Bourdieua." Undergraduate thesis, University of Zadar, 2018. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:162:709035

Miloš, Franko. "Polarizacija hrvatskog političkog prostora kroz teoriju polja Pierrea Bourdieua." Undergraduate thesis, University of Zadar, 2018. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:162:709035

Miloš, F. (2018). 'Polarizacija hrvatskog političkog prostora kroz teoriju polja Pierrea Bourdieua', Undergraduate thesis, University of Zadar, accessed 05 April 2025, https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:162:709035

Miloš F. Polarizacija hrvatskog političkog prostora kroz teoriju polja Pierrea Bourdieua [Undergraduate thesis]. Zadar: University of Zadar; 2018 [cited 2025 April 05] Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:162:709035

F. Miloš, "Polarizacija hrvatskog političkog prostora kroz teoriju polja Pierrea Bourdieua", Undergraduate thesis, University of Zadar, Zadar, 2018. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:162:709035

Please login to the repository to save this object to your list.
Metadata
TitlePolarizacija hrvatskog političkog prostora kroz teoriju polja Pierrea Bourdieua
Title (english)Polarization of the Croatian political space through Pierre Bourdieu's field theory
AuthorFranko Miloš
MentorDražen Cepić (mentor)
Committee memberKrešimir Krolo (predsjednik povjerenstva)
Committee memberSven Marcelić (član povjerenstva)
Committee memberDražen Cepić (član povjerenstva)
GranterUniversity of Zadar
(Department of Sociology)
Zadar
Defense date and country2018-09-24, Croatia
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		SOCIAL SCIENCES
Sociology
Specific Sociologies
Abstract
Ovaj pregledni rad se bavi analizom hrvatskog političkog prostora kroz temeljne koncepte i kategorije Bourdieove teorije polja, s naglaskom na razdoblje od parlamentarnih izbora 2015. godine do danas. Nakon uvoda, koji se kratko bavi nastankom višestranačja u Hrvatskoj i situacijom koja je nastala nakon parlamentarnih izbora 2015. godine, analiziraju se temeljni koncepti teorije polja. Uspjeh MOST-a i Živog zida kao stranaka koje se natječu za poziciju 3.stranke u hrvatskoj politici objašnjava... More se koristeći Bourdieuova razmišljanja o nepovjerenju kojeg stvara politički govor. Analiziraju se razlike u ekonomskom kapitalu između etabliranih i novonastalih stranaka, kao i reprezentacija u medijskom polju, koje je usko povezano s političkim. Uz kratki pregled radova koji se bave populizmom, analizira se uloga tog pojma u hrvatskom političkom polju, koji se od 2015. godine pojavljuje u dvije dimenzije: kao alat za postizanje političkih ciljeva, te kao oružje koje služi kako bi se negativno etiketirali politički suparnici. Za potrebe analize novog tipa polarizacije uvodi se pojam doxe, koji je jedan od najvažnijih koncepata unutar teorije polja te obuhvaća nepisana i internalizirana pravila polja. Zaključuje se kako HDZ i SDP imaju različit odnos prema doxi i zauzimaju ortodoksnu poziciju, dok Živi zid i MOST predstavljaju heterodoksiju, koja se u retorici etabliranih stranaka i medija često prezentira koristeći pojam populizma. Less
Abstract (english)
This paper analyzes the Croatian political space using the core categories within Bourdieu's field theory, with an emphasis on the period since the parliamentary election in 2015 until present date. After the introduction, which gives a brief overview of the origins of the multiparty system and the situation after the parliamentary election in 2015, the analysis shifts towards the core concepts within the field theory. The success of MOST and Živi zid as political parties competing for the... More position of the 3rd most powerful political party is explained through Boudieu's thoughts on distrust caused by political discourse. The differences in economic capital between the established parties and the newly emerged parties is observed, along with the representation in the field of media, which is closely connected to the political field. Morever, the paper presents some of the previous work dealing with populism, and also examines the role of populism in the Croatian political field, that is, the two dimensions of populism since 2015: populism used as a tool to achieve political goals, and populism as a weapon used to impose negative etiquettes on political rivals. The term doxa, one of the most important concepts within the field theory, encompasses unwritten and internalized rules of the field and is used to analyze the new polarization. It is concluded that HDZ and SDP have an orthodox relation towards the field's doxa, while Živi zid and MOST represent heterodoxy, which is often presented using the term populism in the rhetoric of the established parties and the media. Less
Keywords
Keywords (english)
Languagecroatian
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:162:709035
Study programmeTitle: Sociology (double major)
Study programme type: university
Study level: undergraduate
Academic / professional title: sveučilišni/a prvostupnik/prvostupnica (baccalaureus/baccalaurea) sociologije (sveučilišni/a prvostupnik/prvostupnica (baccalaureus/baccalaurea) sociologije)
Type of resourceText
File originBorn digital
Access conditionsAccess restricted to students and staff of home institution
Terms of useLicence In copyright icon
Created on2018-10-03 12:20:06
accessibility

closeAccessibilityrefresh

If you wish to permanently save changes, click on Save, if not - your settings will be reset when you restart the browser.