prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Konstantin Porfirogenet i Toma Arhiđakon
Access restricted to students and staff of home institution
master's thesis
Konstantin Porfirogenet i Toma Arhiđakon
2016. urn:nbn:hr:162:154329
Bauk, Josip
University of Zadar
Department of Classical Philology

Cite this document

Bauk, J. (2016). Konstantin Porfirogenet i Toma Arhiđakon (Master's thesis). Zadar: University of Zadar. Retrieved from https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:162:154329

Bauk, Josip. "Konstantin Porfirogenet i Toma Arhiđakon." Master's thesis, University of Zadar, 2016. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:162:154329

Bauk, Josip. "Konstantin Porfirogenet i Toma Arhiđakon." Master's thesis, University of Zadar, 2016. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:162:154329

Bauk, J. (2016). 'Konstantin Porfirogenet i Toma Arhiđakon', Master's thesis, University of Zadar, accessed 20 December 2024, https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:162:154329

Bauk J. Konstantin Porfirogenet i Toma Arhiđakon [Master's thesis]. Zadar: University of Zadar; 2016 [cited 2024 December 20] Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:162:154329

J. Bauk, "Konstantin Porfirogenet i Toma Arhiđakon", Master's thesis, University of Zadar, Zadar, 2016. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:162:154329

Please login to the repository to save this object to your list.
Metadata
TitleKonstantin Porfirogenet i Toma Arhiđakon
Title (english)Constantine Porphyrogennetos and Thomas the Archdeakon
AuthorJosip Bauk
MentorMilenko Lončar (mentor)
Committee memberNada Bulić (predsjednik povjerenstva)
Committee memberDiana Sorić (član povjerenstva)
Committee memberMilenko Lončar (član povjerenstva)
GranterUniversity of Zadar
(Department of Classical Philology)
Zadar
Defense date and country2016, Croatia
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		HUMANISTIC SCIENCES
Philology
Classical Philology
Abstract
Za rani period srednjeg vijeka ne postoji puno originalnih povijesnih izvora. Uz Ljetopis popa Dukljanina, dva glavna djela za proučavanje tog razdoblja hrvatske povijesti su De administrando imperio Konstantina Porfirogeneta i Historia Salonitana Tome Arhiđakona. Upravo zato što se oskudijeva s ostalim povijesnim izvorima, ova djela su od iznimne važnosti za proučavanje hrvatske povijesti. U ovom diplomskom radu je naglasak stavljen na korelaciju između Porfirogenetovog i Tominog pisanja u njihovim djelima. Proučavajući stručnu literaturu, nastoji se ne samo utvrditi postoji li korelacija između njih dvojice što se tiče pisanja već se i pokazuje o kakvoj je tu korelaciji riječ. Taj posao je moguć zato što se ponekad kod obojice pisaca preklapaju teme o kojima pišu. Tu se uglavnom radi o spominjanju ljudi i događaja vezanih za područje Splita i Dalmacije u 6/7 st. p. Kr. Kroz analizu stručne literature koja je već pručavala ovaj problem, može se doći do zaključka da su obojica autora koristili ponekad iste izvore na temelju kojih su oni kasnije dalje razvijali svoju priču. Naravno, obojica su interpretirali informacije koje bi dobili iz izvora na način koji im je najviše odgovarao, a isto tako su i prema svojim interesima razvijali daljnu priču. Kad se uzme u obzir kontekst i milje kojima obojica autora pripadaju, to i nije čudno.
Abstract (english)
There aren't so many historical sources for studying Croatian early history, especially it's early medieval part. Opus of the Constantine VII. Porphyrogenitus and his work, populary known as De administrando imperio, and the opus of the Thomas the Archdeacon and his work called Historia Salonitana, are the most important and almost only sources for that period. In this thesis is shown what is already found out about their writting. Of course, there is no doubt that they were sometimes writting about same people, facts, events, wars etc. This is normal because sometimes their interests and focuses overlap. Porphyrogenitus in his work covered much more bigger area than Thomas did, but both of them were writting about Split, Dalmatia and the historical and ethnological happenings in that area in the early medevial. So, this thesis begins with the facts about their lifes and their opus. The second and the fundamental part shows what is written in the literature about their writtings about Split, Dalmatia, people and the nations in that area etc. Scientists have already founded some similiraties between their work. They probably used same or similar sources for some topics. This overlap between them is the most important part of this thesis and it is explained very minutely.
Keywords
Keywords (english)
Languagecroatian
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:162:154329
Study programmeTitle: Greek Language and Literature (double major)
Study programme type: university
Study level: graduate
Academic / professional title: magistar/magistra grčkog jezika i književnosti (magistar/magistra grčkog jezika i književnosti)
Type of resourceText
File originBorn digital
Access conditionsAccess restricted to students and staff of home institution
Terms of useLicence In copyright icon
Created on2017-01-23 08:32:33