Answering questions that decide the moral outcome is a result of competition between an automatic, intuitive system (system 1) that encourages a deontological response (not doing any harm to others) and a slow, controlled system (system 2) that favors a utilitarian response (maximizing the greatest good for the largest number of people). The foreign language effect appears in moral decisions that influence the assessment of morality depending on whether the moral dilemma is set in the mother tongue or foreign language. A number of previous studies have dealt with different aspects of moral decision-making in the mother tongue and in a foreign language (Cipolletti et al., 2015; Čavar and Tytus, 2018; Geipel et al., 2015; Keysar et al., 2012). A foreign language increases emotional distance, which leads to a higher probability of responding guided by utilitarian principles (Costa et al. 2014). Use of a foreign language influences moral decision-making and many researchers explain this effect by weakening emotions when using a foreign language and due to the lower prominence of social and moral norms in the foreign language as well as the cognitive and emotional distance of a foreign language. Some researchers have checked whether a foreign language effect also appears in the cognitive reflectivity test, a logical task that requires inhibition of an intuitive response that is incorrect to respond correctly. Most researchers did not find an effect (Białek et al., 2019). Mækelæ and Pfuhl, 2019; Vega-Mendoza et al., 2021), while in one study it was found that the participants had better results on the cognitive reflectivity test if they answered in a foreign language compared to participants who answered in their mother tongue (Costa et al., 2014). Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine the effect of foreign language on some aspects of moral judgments and in the cognitive reflectivity test, while participants were students of the higher years of the English, German and Italian Language studies of the University of Zadar and student members of the Erasmus student organization ESN Coimbra in Portugal (N=142). There was no statistically significant difference in the evaluations of morality between the participants who answered in their mother tongue and between the participants who answered in a foreign language, regardless of which foreign language it was. Furthermore, there is no difference in the number of correct answers between the participants who answered in their native language and the participants who answered in a foreign language, except when the participants answered in their native Croatian language they had a higher number of correct answers compared to the participants who answered in a foreign language German language. A statistically significant difference was found in the number of intuitive answers in the Cognitive Reflectivity Test between groups of participants who answered in Croatian (mother tongue) and those who answered in English (foreign) and Italian (foreign) languages, as well as between participants who answered in Portuguese (mother tongue) and those who answered in English (foreign) language. The participants had a smaller number of intuitive answers in the condition of giving answers in a foreign language. On the other hand, no statistically significant difference was found in the number of intuitive answers on the Cognitive Reflectivity Test between participants who answered in Croatian (mother tongue) and those who answered in German (foreign) language.