This paper analyzes the Croatian political space using the core categories within Bourdieu's field theory, with an emphasis on the period since the parliamentary election in 2015 until present date. After the introduction, which gives a brief overview of the origins of the multiparty system and the situation after the parliamentary election in 2015, the analysis shifts towards the core concepts within the field theory. The success of MOST and Živi zid as political parties competing for the position of the 3rd most powerful political party is explained through Boudieu's thoughts on distrust caused by political discourse. The differences in economic capital between the established parties and the newly emerged parties is observed, along with the representation in the field of media, which is closely connected to the political field. Morever, the paper presents some of the previous work dealing with populism, and also examines the role of populism in the Croatian political field, that is, the two dimensions of populism since 2015: populism used as a tool to achieve political goals, and populism as a weapon used to impose negative etiquettes on political rivals. The term doxa, one of the most important concepts within the field theory, encompasses unwritten and internalized rules of the field and is used to analyze the new polarization. It is concluded that HDZ and SDP have an orthodox relation towards the field's doxa, while Živi zid and MOST represent heterodoxy, which is often presented using the term populism in the rhetoric of the established parties and the media.